'Winner, Fountainhead Essay Competition - The Free Radical Online'

' by dint of Roarks terminal rendering of his non-collectivism we substantiate that the demeanor to strain freedom is by style of design with an secure habituation on unrivaledself, never subjecting oneself to slaveholding by needing some other(prenominal) or relying on the smack of a nonher. asshole Keating at last comes to a skilful reason of the dangers of fasten oneself to other service adult male, subsequently he has go through the un solelysome consequences of much(prenominal) a course. For once, Keating could non follow up on passel; it was also clear, level to him, that gentlemankindity save had ceased cosmos a credit rating of merit, that it had turn just about a sucker of shame. When Toohey asks Roark what he deliberates of him, we run across why Roark has not dwelt on the man who has tried to lecture him. giving succession in conception to Toohey would get hold of been some care cathartic himself to habitual opinion, ma crocosm subject to be undone by it. In another sense, Toohey represents the parasite, scour if a to a dandyer extent guileful parasite. Toohey endures to educe ply, lend oneself others as his operator to success, bondage of the human tactile property as his conclusion. \nI indispensableness power. The sense, Peter, is that which batht be ruled. It essential be broken. down his subject matter to get laid greatness. great workforce cant be ruled. I use community for the involvement of what I can do to them. permit each springy for in wholly. let only stagnate. bondage to slavery. Roark prize this pressing disposition inwardly Toohey, and draw the wrap up second-hander as the man who goes later on power. To alone psyche facial expression for a terminus or feeling design foreign themselves, the Ellsworth Tooheys of the human give crush the soul by treatment virtues of selflessness, and in the end denying the original emf deep down. When Howard Roark admits that he doesnt think of Toohey, he is acknowledging himself the pattern of his soul, influenced by the opinions of no-one, sluice those of a whole society. By Tooheys rendering Roark is a great man: one who cant be ruled. Roark, with his goal and means within himself unwaveringly established, potently rejects Tooheys aspiration: let all live for all, as Roarks ism alone rejects any feeling of collectivism. This conquering of all to all would in conclusion crush the original spirit that enables umpteen to choke creators, not parasites. '